LCJ,
Please consult your Funk & Wagnalls concerning the definition of disingenouous. I think you'll find that it's going a bit far. But, I'm beyond insult. Been around too long. You yourself stated that the lotus might not be the same. I don't have a wiring diagram for whichever Lotus you are referencing. Also, I take it your comment about respecting the statement comparing MGs and Loti was meant to elevate the qualities of the Lotus beyond the reproachability of the MG. Right now in my shop, we are completely overhauling the front and rear suspensions on a 1974 Europa.
This thing could surely not be defended in comparison to an MGTC with regard to durability. Good God, the inner drive yokes, which anchor the upper lateral suspension locator, are retained with roll pins! The yokes themselves were worn out and unavailable. I had to plate the splines and remachine them. The outer hub stub shafts were about to shed themselves of the wheel hubs. I had to machine a new adaptors for each side to firm things up. The conical washers were eaten to death. I'd call them "comical washers" myself. But what could you expect? this car had all of sixteen thousand original miles on the clocki! The mileage is accurate. It is owned by the original purchaser, who has had a hard time accumulating miles because of the doubtfull reliability and build quality of this vehicle.
Now, I'm not trying to judge too harshly here, because I know this car was meant as a lightweight special machine for those who had the understanding to own it. But really, in its day it cost a LOAD more than an MGB. ROLL PINS!! REALLY!!
Yeah, I had a tough week. No hard feelings. But, about that test lamp...
Motorbill
From Lola to Land Rover, If it's British and has wheels, it's likely I've bloodied me knuckles thereupon